Feckless UPA government and hypocrite politicians derailing India

There have been number of incidents which took place in recent past to justify the title of this article, like :-

• Indian government took initiative to hold talks with Pakistan, which has given another chance to Pakistan to raise Kashmir issue, and also Pakistan has been propagating this move of India as their victory saying that Indian government bowed down under the pressure of international community and came back to the negotiating table.

The same UPA government had been regularly stating in past, that there won't be any talks with Pakistan unless they take action against the culprits of 26/11. So now whats the reason of this sudden change of ideology, did Pakistan took any action against Hafiz Saeed ? the answer is NO, that man is still moving freely in Pakistan and even holding press conferences. Now entire nation wants to know whats the reason that UPA government decided to resume talks with Pakistan and why did these shameless people ate their own word ?

• Adherence of UPA government to BT brinjal

when it is scientifically proven that its unfit for human consumption as it leads to problems like, problem with growth, organ development and damage, immune responsiveness and so on, and Rats fed Bt brinjal had diarrhoea, increased water consumption; decrease in liver weight, and liver to body weight, A study from Phillippines shows that people living next to Bt Corn crop fields had developed many mysterious symptoms, especially during pollination time, and today when Greeted with protests in Bangalore over the Bt brinjal, the Environment Minister lost his cool and called one of the protesters a mental patient. Now the question arises is why this government wants to allow commercial release of Bt-brinjal? as there are already 2400 types of brinjals available in India and by the God's grace production of brinjals in our country is also fairly decent in figures, are they completely unaware of these facts mentioned above, or they haven't researched about it ?, or may be this government doesn't care about the health of the citizens of our nation, or is it also another scam of this government ?, only time will give the answers of these questions but one thing which is clear is that if we open our doors to BT brinjal, then actually we are taking a step towards a disaster.

• Failure of UPA government in controlling inflation because of poor governance and no strategic planning and blunders in calculation of stocks of various agricultural food crops.

UPA government had exported pulses to different countries at lower rates, without properly analyzing the demand and production ratio of pulses in country, and now because there is a shortage of pulses they are importing pulses at much higher rates, UPA government had been ignoring the problems of sugarcane farmers, and UPA government's solution to the crisis has only worsened the problems - exporting sugar close to 1 lakh tonne at zero duty levy that worked out to Rs 12 to Rs 14 rate for a kilo. The resulting deficit now forces the Government to import sugar at a much higher rate of Rs 27. And the comments made by Sharad Pawar like "I am not an astrologer....!!!" and today the latest comment made by NCP which goes like this "if you don't consume sugar you will not die, but if you do so, you may suffer from diabetes, and after that you will have to stop consuming sugar." are actually acting as salt on the wounds of people, Now I just wanted to ask these peoples what should we consume then............. prices of vegetables, pulses, milk, sugar, rice n etc are sky high only because of the impotence of agricultural ministry and government, do these people expect us to just keep our mouth shut without even complaining, whereas the ministers of their government are staying in the five star hotels for moths on government's expenses and some of them compares the citizens of our nation to cattle.

• Digvijay Singh raising a questionmark on Batla House encounter calling it fake in Azamgarh (which is a Muslim populated area) and then licking what he spit, under the pressure of top leaders of Congress when they separated themselves from his comments.

A leader of congress Digvijay Singh on a visit to a Muslim populated area Azamgarh tried to capture Muslim vote bank of that region, by putting question mark on Batla house encounter in which Martyr Mohan Chand Sharma lost his life, Digvijay singh said that "its impossible in an encounter to get a head-shot" which actually is nothing more than utter nonsense and bullshit, because when bullets are being fired from both the ends they may hit anyone on any part of the body, so this clearly describes the level of cheap politics going around us, these politicians doesn't even care about the sacrifice of our martyrs, and they could go to any extent for their own profit. though satisfactory thing is that at last Digvijay Singh had to ate his own words.

• Disgusting politics of congress leaders on Maharashtra linguistic problem, to gain the maximum mileage from the controversies created by MNS and Shivsena.

Rahul Gandhi poster boy of congress said that "when Mumbai was under attack the commandos of NSG fought with the terrorists, and those commandos were from Bihar, UP and entire nation". but why these comments were made in Bihar ? but why not in Mumbai, as two days back he was on a visit to Mumbai why didn't he mentioned it over there ? and when he is pointing a finger on parties like Shivsena and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, which are actually a gang of hooligan rather than a political party, he should also criticize state government of Maharashtra which is of congress, because they have only allowed these people to threaten and beat the poor people over there, and even when people like Bal Thakrey calls him "ROME PUTRA" and to his mother Sonaia Gandhi "ITALLIAN MUMMY" congress didn't took any legal action against them so that they can gain the sympathy of public and which may result in the increase of their vote bank.

• False commitments of UPA government

During the time of elections congress committed to the poor people of our nation that if they manage to come back in power, they will be providing them rice and flour at the rate of 3Rs./Kg but when today this issue was raised by Narendra Modi in all Chief Ministers meeting held over inflation, a senior leader of congress Pranab Mukharjee had a clash with him saying that "its not the time to do the politics". This proves that congress made false commitments to the poor peoples of India just to get the power, and they have no intentions to fulfill their commitments. only thing I am unable to understand is how come Narendra modi was doing politics on this issue wouldn't the availability of rice and flour at 3Rs/Kg benefited the poor wouldn't this have affected the raising inflation ?

• Hypocrisy of Thackeray family

We all had been hearing the ridiculous comments of Bal Thackeray and Raj Thackeray for quite a long time, and now they say that Maharashtra is actually meant for only actual Marathi people who took birth in Maharashtra, and if this is the case then entire Thackeray family should leave the Maharashtra immediately and settle to Khandwa district of MP because that's the place from where Bal Thakery actually belongs to and from there only he shifted to Munmbai. These people have been targeting famous personalities like Amitabh Bacchan, Jaya Bacchan, Sachin Tendulkar and now Shahrukh Khan just to remain in limelight by using the name of these famous personalities, and this is because our Home minister P.Chidambram also stated the same comment that was mentioned by Shahrukh but they Shivsena didn't reacted to that because they know that he is also a political person and by targating him they will not get that sort of political mileage as they will get by targeting Shahrukh Khan. another example of hypocrisy of these people is, as these people have been stating themselves anti Pakistan then why they haven't yet criticized the move of UPA government to resume talks with Pakistan ain't they aware of this news or are they too busy to exploit the current controversy ?

Questionmark on Indian Diplomacy

As controversy deepens on joint statement issued by India and Pakistan in Egypt, its giving a clear message to the world that whatever happened there was not in the interest of our nation and the tragedy is its being confirmed by none other than but our foreign secretary, its really very disappointing to hear from him that "may be the words used in joint statement were not appropriate but there shouldn't be any doubt on its intentions". The question is why did our strategy planner couldn't find or failed to find the appropriate words because of which nation didn't took the joint statement in the way its being claimed by our government ? This is not the only question, that why we accepted to move on with talks excluding terrorism, but why did we let Baluchistan issue being mentioned in joint statement ? this is very disappointing that by this joint statement India seems to be accepting that its our hand in imbalance of Baluchistan, presence of Baluchistan issue in joint statement shows the weakness of Indian diplomacy or I should be calling it a diplomatic blunder, this isn't a good thing that India has given a topic to Pakistan just like that, and now with the help of this topic Pakistan may put India in penalty box on international stages. Definitely there is no logic in letting the mention of Baluchistan issue in joint statement just to avoid the issue of Kashmir.

Maybe central government is trying to justify the joint statement, but the way congress men are avoiding to open their mouths on this issue clearly indicates that our diplomats and strategy planner have committed a big mistake, and now they must find some solution for this, else India will have to face the negative publicity by Pakistan on the international stage, and this should also be kept in mind that India doesn't look like answering Pakistan in their language and dealing with their dirty game sensibly. Its hard to understand that the same prime minister who was dragging Pakistani leadership publicly in penalty box about a month back today seems to dropping his weapons in front of Pakistani P.M. Entire nation wants to know why this happened ? what were the circumstances because of which we had to face this disgrace ? after all what happened in the past one month which made our strategy maker to reach on the conclusion that Pakistan is now on right track ? but the fact is Pakistan isn't interested in taking action against the culprits of 26/11 neither they are willing to dismantle terrorist structure nor they are going to stop promoting terrorism against India, then keeping all these things in mind what was the need of carrying soft approach towards Pakistan was it because of American pressure or were their some other reasons? this is also weird that India took more than 24hrs to deny the claims of Pakistan that they have handed over proofs of involvement of Indian intelligence agency on attack over Srilankan cricket team. All these things only proves that Indian diplomacy is suffering from weakness as well as from laziness, and if its actually true which is being signaled by all these circumstances then there couldn't be anything more disappointing and a bigger matter of concern.

Homage To Martyrs Of Kargil

We salute to the following brave men who made supreme sacrifices of their lives to uphold the dignity of the nation :

OFFICERS (INDIAN ARMY)

LT. COL. VISHWANATHAN LT. COL. VIJAYARAGAHVAN LT. COL. SACHIN KUMAR MAJOR AJAY SINGH JASROTIA MAJOR KAMLESH PATHAK MAJOR PADHMAPHANI ACHARYA MAJOR MARRIAPAN SARVANAN MAJOR RAJESH SINGH ADHIKARI

MAJOR HARMIDER PAL SINGH MAJOR MANOJ TALWAR MAJOR VIVEK GUPTA MAJOR SONAM WANGCHUK MAJOR AJAY KUMAR CAPTAIN AMOL KALIA CAPTAIN KIESHING CLIFFORD NONGRUM

CAPTAIN SUMEET ROY CAPTAIN AMIT VERMA CAPTAIN PANNIKOT VISVANATH VIKRAM CAPTAIN ANUJ NAYYAR CAPTAIN VIKRAM BATRA DY. COMMANDENT JOY LAL(BSF) CAPTAIN JINTU GOGOI

LT. VIJAYANT THAPER LT. N. KENGURUSE LT. HANIF-U-DIN LT. SUARAV KALIA LT. AMIT BHARDWAJ LT. BALWAN SINGH LT. MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY

OFFICERS (INDIAN AIR FORCE)

SQUADREN LEADER AJAY AHUJA SQUADREN LEADER RAJIV PUNDIR

FLT. LT. S MUHILAN FLT. LT. NACHIKETA RAO

SEARGENT PVNR PRASAD SERGEANT RAJ KISHORE SAHU

JUNIOR COMMISSIONED OFFICERS (INDIAN ARMY)

Naik Chaman Singh Naik R Kamraj Naik Kudeep Singh Naik Birendra Singh Lamba Naik Jasvir Singh Naik Surendra Pal Naik Rajkumar Punia Naik S N Malik Naik Surjeet Singh Naik Jugal Kishore Naik Suchha Singh Naik Sumer Singh Rathod Naik Surendra Singh Naik Kishen Lal Naik Rampal Singh Naik Ganesh Yadav

Havaldar Major Yashvir Singh Lance Naik Ahmed Ali Lance Naik Gulam Mohammed Khan Lance Naik M R Sahu Lance Naik Satpal Singh Lance Naik Shatrugan singh Lance Naik Shyam Singh Lance Naik Vijay Singh Naik Degender Kumar

Havaldar Baldev Raj Havaldar Jai Prakash Singh Havaldar Mahavir Singh Havaldar Mani Ram Havaldar Rajbir Singh Havaldar Satbir Singh Havaldar Abdul Karim Havaldar Daler Singh Bahu Subedar Bhanwar Singh Rathod

Rifleman Linkon Pradhan Rifleman Bachhan Singh Rifleman Satbir Singh Rifleman Jagmal Singh Rifleman Rattan Chand Rifleman Mohamad Farid Rifleman Mohamad Aslam Rifleman Yogendra Singh Rifleman Sanjay Kumar

SEPOYS (INDIAN ARMY)

Grenadier Manohar Singh Gunner Uddabh Das Sepoy Amardeep Singh Sepoy Vijay Pal Singh Sepoy Virendra Kumar Sepoy Yashwant Singh

Sepoy Santokh Singh Sepoy Dinesh Bhai Sepoy Harendragiri Goswami Sepoy Amrish Pal Bangi Constable Suraj Bhan (BSF) Sepoy Lakhbir Singh

Sepoy Bajindra Singh Sepoy Deep Chand Sepoy Dondibha Desai Sepoy Keolanand Dwivedi Sepoy Harjindra Singh Sepoy Jaswant Singh Sepoy Jaswinder Singh

Sepoy Lal Singh Sepoy Rakesh Kumar(RAJ) Sepoy Rakesh Kumar (Dogra) Sepoy Raswinder Singh Sepoy Bir Singh Sepoy Ashok Kumar Tomar Sepoy R. Selvakumar

Remembering Kargil

This is the 10Th anniversary of Kargil war, it was the war in which Pakistan's army tried to capture hills of Dras-Kargil, In this war Indian army defeated Pak army and its mujaheddin, generally the overview of Kargil war is looked as another attempt of Pakistan to capture Kashmir by the help of kabaielies as they tried in 1947-48 and 1965, but actually Kargil war is a significant point of the 20yrs old mission of jehadi's to capture Kashmir and imbalance India, kargil war is also different in many ways to the previous wars fought between India and Pakistan, this war was fought when Pak already acquired the status of nuclear power, and Islamabad developed counterbalancing relations with India, during the time of war Pak also had around 10,000 mujaheddin who were ready to indulge in the battle anytime all those mujaheddin were prepared for war by teaching them the lessons of extremism and at a point of time they also enjoyed support of CIA and money from Saudi Arab, all these mujahids were actually Muslims from Arab, middle Asia,Pashtoon tribesman, Pakistanis etc.. Pakistan had been dreaming to capture Kashmir since they acquired nuclear weapons and they don't hesitate to say that their nuclear weapons are to compete with India some of them also have courage to say that Nuclear weapon is like an umbrella under which Pakistan can open Kashmir issue , they have a false belief that nuclear weapons have brought them into a state of equality and equilibrium against India, their actual motive is to capture Kashmir when Indian leadership is in weak hands or in a state of fix, Pakistan started giving shape to its intentions in 1989 when V.P Singh was the P.M of India during that time Pakistan sent thousands of intruders in Kashmir and Pak's foreign minister Yakoob Khan tried to give nuclear threatening to India, from 1991 to 1999 Pak launched large number of jehadi missions in Kashmir and thousands of innocent people and soldiers of Indian army lost their lives, but still after all this Pak kept on starving for success in Kashmir and couldn't achieve its goal, up till now Pak had succeeded to set up its puppet government in Kabul in the form of Taliban which made Osama more powerful and as a result, organizations spreading terror in Kashmir also became the part of jehadi terrorism , by the presence of terrorist organizations like Laskar, jaish,Harkat -ul-Mujaheddin and others pak tried to capture Kashmir by intrusion in kargil. Actually after Lahore peace process, pak army was in illusion that there is a weak government in power in India, although Nawaz saharif tried to separate himself from Kargil incident, saying he was unaware of the entire plot which was planned by Parvez Musharraf but the fact is that he was completely aware of the situation and pak army had backing of Nawaz Shareef, in India Vajpayee government not only strongly dealt with the situation and fought back but also achieved international glory by showing immense composure and courage, to counter Pak's intrusion in Indian territory, Indian Air Force and Infantry worked with great co-ordination and intruders were plucked-off from India soil who were in misconception that they will succeed to capture Kashmir and the most important thing during this incident was Indian troops didn't crossed LOC not even a single time during the entire combat, Pakistan was hoping that after this incident they will be able to drag Kashmir issue in U.N security council but India spilled cold water on their intentions by not crossing LOC, because the war was fought completely on Indian soil Pak couldn't execute its plan,during those times all three wings of Indian army were ready to counter any major attack from Pakistan. As the war progressed Pakistan was standing alone on the Kargil issue and because of the activeness of Indian Air Force pak troops failed to move ahead and entire Kargil episode ended in very embarrassing situation for Pakistan, just after this incident Pak army dethroned elected government of Nawaz shareef, but they still haven't given up their intentions of capturing Kashmir and they are using jehadi terrorism as a medium to achieve their motive. Kargil was neither the first and nor the last attempt of Pakistan to conquer Kashmir, its also neither the start nor the end of proxy war against India by Pakistan , but Kargil incident made it crystal clear for Pakistan that they can't defeat India in any direct war, but this doesn't mean that ISI and Pakistan have given up their intentions to colour Indian soil with Indian blood.

Relevance of Women's Reservations

Women reservation is an issue of national debate, even in president's speech this topic managed to gained special importance, but if we look at the facts about the field of women empowerment then the statistics are quite surprising, Today Pratibha Patil is sitting on the chair of president, Meera Kumar holds the post of speaker of Lok-Sabha, largest political party of country is lead by Sonia Gandhi, Sushma Swaraj is deputy leader of opposition, Mayawati is chief minister of a state which holds maximum number of Lok-Sabha seats,Mamta banerjee has been giving real tough time to Left Front, and womens like Rabri Devi,Jayalalita and Vasundhra Raje Scindhia have also had the taste of power in their states, 15th Lok sabha has more than 10% women M.P's in the house.the truth is that women are leading in all fields of national-life but still there are people who think they should be given reservation.

                                                                Basic question arises here is that ,Is the reservation only solution of all problems of national life ? Muslim groups are demanding reservation on the basis of their religion, we all remember the controversy which arise on the counting of number of Muslims in Indian Army, parties like Congress, SP, RJD, LJP are supporters of reservations on the basis of religion, all of us witnessed the heavy destruction caused during Gujjar movement, and now there are demands of reservations in the private sectors, youth of different classes have started putting questions on their respective political party's reservation kota, question of women reservation has been hanging like a sword for the last 13 years.

 

                                                         But reality is that, no reservation could be justified its not a healthy competition, it only snatches up the rights of talent and ability, it strongly hurts the talented people, and the one who is favored by reservation looses his respect and dignity, reservation is against the principal of equal citizens, equal cultures and one nation.

                                                Constitution developers of India were strictly against the principal of reservations, in constitution meeting topic of reservations was discussed for complete two days Naziruddin Ahmad said " any sort of reservation will have negative effect on political development of country and it  will develop the feeling of inferiority", Jagat Narayan Laal said "India will be a secular state and after this there shouldn't be any demands for reservations." many members spoke about this topic and among all of them no body justified the basic thoughts behind reservations, but they agreed that in the current prevailing situations it would be better to give temporary reservations to schedule castes, J.L Nehru said " I want that even the remaining reservations should be abolished , but in current scenario it won't be a smart step to remove reservations for schedule castes." 

                                                                                                           So the reservations for schedule caste was temporary, and there is a provision of reviewing them after the regular interval of 10 years, makers of our constitution allowed reservations to schedule castes for their upliftment and bringing them to the mainstream of the society, but there was also a provision of schedule caste commission, to analyze the profits and loss of reservations {annexture 338}, now if even after 62 years of independence there is a need of women reservations then its really a matter of shame for nation and all of us, and the key question which arises here is that will this reservations be permanent ?

                                                      Our constitution has given us some fundamental rights and according to annexture(15) nation can not differentiate among its citizens on the basis of state, religion, caste, sex or birth place but reservation enforces the nation to differentiate among its citizens, makers of constitution had a dream that nation-state will benefit every one by its economy, governance and policies and all the boundaries like caste, religion, region and sex will vanish one day, and nationalism will be only indistinguishability.                                          Central and state governments have invested a huge sum of money for upliftment of people, and people of all castes, societies and sectors have been benefited, but still more than 30 crores of people are below poverty line, but in the fields like education, science, engineering, infrastructure and capital development, progress has been phenomenal, and advantages and profits of national economy and development has been received equally by men and women.

                                                                                                                                                  Basic question is after all what is the need of reservation in 62 years old competitive democracy ? Is Indian national-state working with injustice and being impartial towards some castes, religions, sex and groups ? If we look at ancient history of India which explains us that women have always been treated with utmost respect, and enjoyed special position in India, and those days there was no reservation for women, and if we look at modern times then we have example of Indira Gandhi who enhanced India's pride,honor and prestige in Bangladesh war, arguably better than a man .

            So basically what is the fundamental relevance of women reservation ? there have been many suggestions given by different political parties about women reservations, like Samajwadi party wants to bring in the caste system in women reservations which means separate reservations for women of schedule castes, backward classes and Muslims women, and the demands of BSP are also similar. States like U.P and Bihar have women reservations in Gram Panchatyat, and if we leave the exceptions then most of the posts of those women are actually run by either their husband or any other relative, S.P also gave an suggestion that according to reservations, distribution of tickets should be left on the parties, although BJP has opposed the idea of including caste system in women reservation and congress also seems to agree with BJP on this issue, but there are lots of questions that arises here

• Will women reservation be able to help the process of women empowerment ?
• Will women reservation be permanent unlike the reservations of SC/ST and backward classes ?
• Is reservation appropriate and only option for for upliftment of women ?
• If these reservation won't be permanent then what would be its time limit?
• How it would be judged that women reservation has achieved its objective and how it would be abolished?
• what would be the consequences of these reservations?

If its so important to give reservations to women, then all these issues should also be kept in mind and there should be a through and sincere debate over these topics, and above all there is a requirement to think that by giving these reservations aren't we doing injustice to people of other sex ?

Why Today Every Party Is Lining Up To Support Congress ?

Since last 3days almost every party is running to support congress unconditionally, whereas before the announcement of polling results all such parties were leaving no chance to criticize Congress, before 16th all these parties were against congress and today they see no evil in congress, what is the reason of this sudden change? whether it was SP(Samajwadi Party), BSP(Bahujan samaj Party), RJD(Rashtiya Janta Dal), LJP(Lok Janshakti Party) or Left, all of them talked about the failures and demerits of congress and today they are all lining up to support congress unconditionally.

                                                          It hasn't been much time when we all heard Amar Singh and Digvijay Singh abusing each other and Amar Singh comparing congress to Draupadi Mulayam to Lord Krishna and Left to Dushahssan, or  Mayawati calling Congress and BJP the party of thieves, or Lalu Yadav and Ramvilas paswaan speaking against congress, or Left  parties who considered BJP and Congress as the threat to nation, today all these people are running  to support congress.

                                                                                As far as my knowledge and understanding serves me, the only reason why all these people are lining up to offer support to congress is only because they all have many cases of corruption and scams lying against them and just to make sure that those cases do not reopen they all are trying to stand with congress, because in our country ruling government has control over investigation agencies and they are being used according to the comfort of central government, and if its not true then how come in Taj Corridor case against Mayawati no progress is made since late 2003 when she gave support to UPA government and how come every time Gujarat Riots case comes to limelight just before elections, so the point that I want to make is no party is completely  pure. 

                                   But today when congress doesn't need parties like SP, BSP and Left  Amar sigh says that Manmohan Singh has asked for their support, Mayawati says that Manmohan singh ringed her and he considers her as his younger sister, well if all these things are really true then I suppose that L.K Adwani was right calling Manmohan singh as weak PM, and if Manmohan singh really considers Mayawati as her younger sister then I would like to remind him that before him Lalji Tandon also once considered Mayawati as his sister and in return Mayawati awarded him with the title of LALCHI(GREEDY) Tandon, but I wish Manmohan Singh all the best with his new younger sister, here I would also like to mention that just before elections Digvijay and Amar singh resolved their differences with the medium of media, and it was Digvijay who took this initiative, and not to forget that Rahul Gandhi offered the hand of friendship to Left and there was also a rumor that congress may offer support to Left, but fortunately everything went in the favour of Congress and Manmohan Singh emerged as king but all the credit went to Yuvraj Rahul Gandhi, also the credit for getting 21seats in U.P was given to Rahul Gandhi but I don't think it was Rahul factor, because Rahul also went to Bihar for campaigning but there congress didn't got any benefit, so  the actual credit of success of Congress in U.P should go to the poor governance of Mayawati or I should be saying corrupt governance of Mayawati.

                                              Anyways national festival of republic of India is over voters have given their verdict, and somewhere deep inside common man has realised that it doesn't matter who forms the government, its the common man who always gets exploited and still he hopes that things will change and he & his family will get a better world to live.

Verdict Of Indian Voters

Results of elections'2009 have been announced and UPA (United Progressive Alliance) has emerged as the largest coalition with 257 seats out of 543, where as NDA(National Democratic Alliance) secured only 164 seats, this result has brought BJP into a state of shock and L.k Adwani has announced that he doesn't want to be the leader of opposition anymore, although he will remain in active politics because BJP has rejected Adwani's offer to resign, whereas the condition of third front and fourth front is also not better, third front has suffered loss except BJD(Biju Janta Dal) who got 13 seats out of 21 in Orissa, and Left has suffered the loss of 36 seats and they have got only 24 seats in their account and BSP Mayawati's party couldn't repeat the miracle as they did in Rajy sabha elections and received only 20 seats as Mayawati said " we have all options open" I suppose she will have to eat her own words. Where as if we talk about the fourth front their condition is really pathetic RJD of Lalu Prasad yadav has got only 3 seats, RJD leader who fought on two seats lost one of them, and Ram Vilas Paswan leader of LJP(Loh Janshakti Party) who used to be the part of every government couldn't managed to win at least a single seat he even lost his own seat from Hajipur, so it was only SP(samajwadi party) who got 23 seats who managed to perform in fourth front although they have also suffered the loss of 13 seats, in U.P biggest gainer here is Congress who captured 21 seats whereas last time they got only 9 seats. Parties like Congress(+56), TC(+17), JDU(+12), ADMK(+9) have emerged as the biggest gainers where as if we talk about top losers first comes Left(-36),RJD(-21),BJP(-18),SP(-13),and LJP(-4). These results are asusual quite different from all exit polls which we saw on T.V in last few days, but if we look at the positive aspects of these elections we can see that Indian voter has become more aware and mature for example

• we have cases of Manoj Tiwari who is a Bhojpuri singer & actor who lost from Gorakhpur, Shekhar Suman lost from Patna Sahib, Nafisa Ali lost from Lucknow this shows people need serious politicians rather any one from film fraternity or a star from any field who has got no experience.
• Another example we have of Mukhtar Ansari who is in jail for the murder of MLA krishnanand Rai, Mayawati's party (BSP) gave ticket to Mukhtar Ansari from Varanasi but the people of Varanasi completely rejected him we also have similar examples of D.P Yadav who lost Badayun, Afzal Ansari brother of Mukhtar Ansari who lost from Gjipur and similar is the case of Ateek Ahmed, so this proves that people need a politician with a clean background, now common man has learnt to differentiate between a criminal and a politician.
• Next example is of LJP leader Ram Vilas Paswan till now he has been the part of every government whether it was of NDA or UPA or any other, and just before the elections he used to separate himself from government and used to stood against them to enhance his vote bank but this time his formula completely failed and he couldn't even manage to get a single seat he even failed to retain his own seat Hajipur, so this shows that the people of this country are smart enough to understand such political stunts.
• Most important positive point that I see in these results is that people of this country have understood the importance of national parties now they have realized that dominance of regional parties in Loksabha only paralyzes the central government because regional parties don't have any national issues or ideology so its better to restrict them to their state only.

These results have also surprised many people who were thinking that Congress has lost its ground on the issues of terrorism and inflation and BJP will get its advantage, but current scenario is lateral inverted and now I don't think that there is any need to discuss these topics here because its Indian voters whose decision counts and is final, and voters have given their verdict in favour of UPA. so now I think that now NDA must introspect that this time they had very strong issues still they lost so certainly there is some thing going wrong and they need to check that out.